State v. Chenault
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. The state maintains the sentencing judge erred in failing to assess points against appellee because he committed the crime while in custody serving a sentence. Rule 3.701(d)(6) in conjunction with Rule 3.988(i) says that persons who are in custody serving a sentence and who then commit another crime shall have twenty-four points scored against them, thus increasing the sentence in many cases.
The crime appellee committed was escape, so “in custody serving a sentence” is an element of the crime of escape and thus was factored into the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Canterbury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989