Legal Opinion

State v. Chenault

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1989No. 88-1531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. The state maintains the sentencing judge erred in failing to assess points against appellee because he committed the crime while in custody serving a sentence. Rule 3.701(d)(6) in conjunction with Rule 3.988(i) says that persons who are in custody serving a sentence and who then commit another crime shall have twenty-four points scored against them, thus increasing the sentence in many cases.

The crime appellee committed was escape, so “in custody serving a sentence” is an element of the crime of escape and thus was factored into the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Canterbury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API