Legal Opinion

Di Bacco v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided May 28, 1968No. Claim No. 48497PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMilton Alperx, J.

This is a cross motion, filed March 13, 1968, for permission for late filing of a claim pursuant to the Court of Claims Act (§ 10, subd. 5). Briefly, the facts as submitted to the court in claimants’ application are that the State entered upon claimants’ property without permission to make borings during the early portion of the summer of 1966 and that during the course of such work many pepper plants were directly destroyed while others suffered damage which resulted in the harvesting of a reduced crop in the fall of 1966.

Thus, the claim is one in tort to which the 90-day filing requirement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McMahon v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Rugg v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Penn No. 5, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walach v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Gonzalez v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API