Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Quigley

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 10, 1960No. Civ. No. 1099-59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This is an action under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., to set aside a denial by defendant of benefits under said act to the plaintiff herein. Jurisdiction of this court depends on § 921(b) of the said act.

“(b) If not in accordance with law, a compensation order may be suspended or set aside, in whole or *569in part, through injunction proceedings, mandatory or otherwise, brought by any party in interest against the deputy commissioner making the order, and instituted in the Federal district court for the judicial district…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bassett v. Massman Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Continental Fire And Casualty Insurance Company v. J. J. O'learyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Independent Pier Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dantes v. Western Foundation Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. United States Ex Rel. Ayala v. TubmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
  3. Dantes v. Western Foundation Corporation AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Atlantic Ship Rigging Co. v. McLellanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API