Legal Opinion

State v. Bierilo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 26, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

38 N.J. Super. 581 (1956)

120 A.2d 125

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

BOLESLAR A. BIERILO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 23, 1956.

Decided January 26, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. John S. Bender argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Jay F. Dailey, attorney; Messrs. Turek & Bender, of counsel).

Mr. Morris Margaretten, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Alex Eber, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. John B. Molineux, First Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BaumgartnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. State v. HunterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. State v. CottrellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Palmer v. SandersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  5. State v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HenryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. State v. IngramNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. State v. HulsizerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. State v. LatorreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. State v. HallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API