Patrick v. Whitely
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Perry Circuit Court. Edward W. Wineield, Judge. The amendment to the complaint should not have been allowed. 51 Am. St. Rep. 414; 70 N. Y. 190; 96 N.. Y. 284; 132 N. Y. 22; Í08 N. Y. 152; 1 Enc. PI. & Pr. 583; 84 N. Y. 420; 59 Ark. 165; 88 N. C. 95; 63 N. H. 420; 96 N. C. 416; 26 Or. 449; 51 Atl. 1025; 82 Ga. 623; 59 Me. 398; 65 Wis. 554; 60 N. W. 253; 79 Mo. 88. - The joinder was improper.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Perry Circuit Court. Edward W. Wineield, Judge. The amendment to the complaint should not have been allowed. 51 Am. St. Rep. 414; 70 N. Y. 190; 96 N.. Y. 284; 132 N. Y. 22; Í08 N. Y. 152; 1 Enc. PI. & Pr. 583; 84 N. Y. 420; 59 Ark. 165; 88 N. C. 95; 63 N. H. 420; 96 N. C. 416; 26 Or. 449; 51 Atl. 1025; 82 Ga. 623; 59 Me. 398; 65 Wis. 554; 60 N. W. 253; 79 Mo. 88. - The joinder was improper. Sand. & H. Dig. § 5703; 38 Ark. 594; 198 111. 462; 52 Atl. 241; 35 S. E. 899; 1 Estee, PI. § 314. The claim was not affected by the amendment. 32 Ark. 134; 33 Ark. 543 The instructions were…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
This action was commenced on the 27th of May, 1902, by J. H. Whitely against W. H. Patrick, J. F. Cooper and Arthur Sewell by filing the following complaint and suing out summons thereon:
“PERRY CIRCUIT COURT.
"J. H. Whitely, plaintiff, v. “W. H. Patrick, J. F. Cooper and Arthur Sewell, defendants.
“The plaintiff states that the defendants at the time of filing this complaint were partners. That they are indebted to him in the sum of $636.96 for work and labor performed and timber furnished them during the year 1902. A bill of particulars is herewith filed, marked ‘Exhibit A’ to this complaint.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Midland Valley Railroad v. EnnisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Austin v. Dermott Canning Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- American Bonding Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Loretto Literary Society v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- Cottonwood Lumber Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.