Morgan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Respectfully, I dissent. I believe that Claimant established a substantial and unilateral change in the terms of his employment that constituted a necessitous and compelling reason for his resignation. Employer’s elimination of a valuable fringe benefit, unilaterally and without any advance warning, reduced Claimant’s compensation by approximately 50%. That the fringe benefit was cost-free transportation to the workplace matters not to the question of whether it was a form of compensation.
Claimant began working for Employer on October 18, 2010, as a foreman.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brunswick Hotel & Conference Center, LLC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- STEINBERG VISION ASSOCIATES v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ship Inn, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- A-Positive Electric v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- J. C. Penney Co. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.