Garcia v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, we must apply Alaska Criminal Rule 45(c) to a situation that is not specifically addressed in the rule. As we explain in more detail below, the three defendants in this case were each charged with driving while intoxicated. After the Department of Public Safety took administrative action against their driver’s licenses, the district court dismissed the criminal charges on double jeopardy grounds. These charges were reinstated several months later, after we decided an unrelated appeal (State v. Zerkel) that involved the same double…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Rutherford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
- Billman v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998