Legal Opinion

People v. Bast

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum, The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified by reversing the conviction of criminal negligence pursuant to section 1053-a of the Penal Law and dismissing that *815count of the indictment. Proof of intoxication alone is not enough to sustain a conviction of criminal negligence. The People must also prove that the defendant’s intoxication affected his physical and mental capacity to the extent that it caused him to operate his vehicle in a culpably reckless manner (People v. Fink, 18 A D 2d 220; People v. Manning, 7 A D 2d 1008; People v. Harvin, 47 Misc 2d 367; People v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Fyfe, New York County Courts1957
  2. People v. HarvinNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. MojicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Green v. County Court of Tompkins CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. People v. CarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API