Legal Opinion

Scoville v. Vail Investment Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1940No. Civil No. 4204PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

By agreement of the parties, the three appeals which are discussed in this opinion were presented to the court for consideration as a whole. Based upon the rule that the trial court is presumed to have found every fact necessary to sustain its judgment that may reasonably be deduced from the evidence, the general factual situation may be stated as follows, with more details given as this opinion requires.

Carrie Vail, hereinafter called deceased, had for many years been a resident of Pima county. She had been married twice, and by the first marriage had one child, Maude Vail Merriam, and by…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Armer v. ArmerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. WJ Kroeger Co. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hogle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Zimmerman v. FawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API