Legal Opinion

Meeme Mutual Home Protective Fire Insurance v. Lorfeld

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

There is practically no dispute in the evidence. The findings of the trial court are well supported by it. The controversy arises over what in law constitutes a mistake of fact. This matter was carefully considered by *324this court in Kowalke v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. 103 Wis. 472, 79 N. W. 762. The court there said:

“The most philosophical definition we have found is that presented by Pdmeroy (Eq. Jur. § 839) : ‘an unconscious ignorance or forgetfulness of the existence or nonexistence of a fact, past or present, material to the contract.’ This definition contains several elements, each of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Kowalke v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hurd v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gielow v. NapiorkowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. LahiffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Steiden Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API