Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Holmstrom

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 27, 1992No. WCB 87-0155M; CA A68422Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order denying authorization for reimbursement from the Reopened Claims Reserve (Reserve). ORS 656.625.1 We reverse.

In March, 1987, after claimant’s aggravation rights had expired, the Board entered an order pursuant to ORS 656.278, requiring SAIF to reopen his claim and to begin paying time loss benefits. SAIF complied with that order until August 13, 1990, when it closed the claim. Because claimant was not medically stationary at that time, he asked the Board to order SAIF to reopen the claim. The Board granted claimant’s request, ordering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. EBI Companies v. Kemper Group/American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API