Legal Opinion
Parks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 14, 1971No. 71-913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant was found guilty of rape after a jury trial. The judgment was affirmed upon appeal. See Parks v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 206 So.2d 431. This appeal is from a denial of appellant’s third petition for relief pursuant to CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A. Appellant’s petition for relief alleges that he did not receive a fair trial because of: (1) remarks of the state’s attorney which were not supported by the evidence, (2) remarks of the state’s attorney designed to arouse racial prejudice in the jury, (3) the failure of the trial court to sever appellant’s trial from that of the other defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Parks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Robert L. Cade v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., Warden, Georgia State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- Featherston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- McNamara v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Nollan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1972