Legal Opinion
DiVirgilio v. Norton Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 7, 1972No. Civ. A. 69-310PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
Of two joint tortfeasors, one was plaintiff’s employer, and had paid over $12,000 in workmen’s compensation, (for which we shall use the symbol CP). The verdict was for $40,000.00 (symbol V). An undetermined amount of future compensation (CF) would have been due at the rate of $62.50 per month until the employee’s widow dies or remarries.
After briefs and a lengthy and thorough oral argument, the chief issue'as to which disagreement between counsel persisted appears to be whether plaintiff’s counsel is entitled to a fee on the total obligation of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stark v. Posh Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Wall v. Conn Welding & Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Long v. Marino Masse, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Zuchowski v. John S. Marvin Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franges v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Frank Irey, Jr., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Charles v. Grimm v. O. K. Keckley Co., and Third-Party v. Ramclif Supply and Evans Products Company, Third-Party Appeal of Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Charles v. Grimm v. O. K. Keckley Co., and Third-Party v. Ramclif Supply and Evans Products Company, Third-Party Appeal of Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Charles v. Grimm v. O. K. Keckley Co., and Third-Party v. Ramclif Supply and Evans Products Company, Third-Party Appeal of Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.