Alliance First National Bank v. Spies
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.
Plaintiff argues that, since the warrant of attorney in the note expressly authorizes confession of judgment against defendants “at any time after this obligation becomes due” and authorizes the attorney so confessing “to execute a release of all errors or right of appeal, ’ ’ the attorney confessing judgment was authorized to confess such judgment after the statute of limitations had run; and that, even if it was error to do so, such attorney was authorized to waive such error.
If this argument of plaintiff were sustained, then, *501by delivering a note incorporating such a warrant of attorney,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Kerper v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1891
- Commonwealth Loan Co. v. FirestineOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Swisher v. Orrison Cigar Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.