Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Town of Exeter

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 29, 2009No. C.A. No. WC03-0226Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court is the motion of Defendants Town of Exeter ("the Town") and the Exeter Planning Commission ("the Commission") for summary judgment against Plaintiff Phillip Salisbury ("Salisbury"). Defendants argue that the present action, in which Salisbury seeks a declaratory judgment that he is legally entitled to use a certain parcel of property for ingress and egress, is barred by collateral estoppel, res judicata, and administrative finality. Jurisdiction is pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 9-30-1.

I

Facts and Travel

This case has a truly tortuous (and, as counsel have suggested,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Johnston Ambulatory Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. NolanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Palmisciano v. Burrillville Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. Estate of Giuliano v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Foster-Glocester Regional School Committee v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API