Legal Opinion
Dayton Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Dorman Automotive Parts Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 5, 1930No. 508Published
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
This suit involves the validity of Short patent, No. 1,538,303, having to do with improvements in transmission belts, and concerns claims of said patent No. 1 to 11, inclusive, excepting 6 and 10.
The Dayton Rubber Manufacturing Company is the owner of an undivided one-fourth interest in said patent by assignment, and the General Motors Research Corporation, made party plaintiff by amendment, is the owner by assignment of tbe undivided three-fourths interest in said patent.
The defendant, the Dorman Automotive Parts Company, is the distributor of the manufactured article…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Hale & Kilburn Mfg. Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1904
- MacClemmy v. Gilbert Corset Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1915