Legal Opinion

Hall v. Heer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice BurNett

Plaintiff in error filed his petition for the writ of habeas corpus complaining of being confined in the maximum security portion of the prison without reason and was thus being deprived of “the privileges and his restricted freedom enjoyed by the other inmates of the prison,” that “such punishment constitutes prejudicial treatment against him; and further, that it constitutes cruel and inhuman punishment, a violation of the petitioner’s constitutional right of the Eighth Amendment which provides that no cruel or unusual punishment be inflicted.”

In this petition a hearing was requested so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Platek v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Sarshik v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Adams v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State ex rel. Jordan v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Passarella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  2. State v. WarrenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Stewart v. McWherterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Ricks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API