Hull v. Enoch Morgan Sons Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the Court
McAdam, Ch. J.
The jury, upon the trial, by special •verdict, found that the services specified in the bill of particulars prior to July, 188 i, had been fully paid. It was, by consent of the parties, reserved for the court to decide whether the defendant (a corporation) can legally Re charged for the services specified in the bill of particulars to have been rendered subsequent to July, 1882, and if so, to determine the reasonable value of such services. *70The items of the bill so reserved may be grouped, under two heads, viz.:
Eirst. Services rendered in the matter of the petition to set aside…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Willcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- New v. . NicollNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Hooker v. . Eagle Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.