Piatt v. St. Clair's Heirs
Ohio Supreme Court
In Chancery. This case was submitted to the court in Hamilton county, and reserved for a decision here. It had been fully argued before the last Court in Bank, but sent back to Hamilton county to additional parties. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court. The arguments are too voluminous to be inserted.
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT J.
delivered the opinion of the court. The complainant claims to be a judgment creditor o£ the estate of St. Clair, and to have issued execution, which has been returned nidia bona ; and he prays this court to charge his demand upon certain real estate which was of the intestate, now in the hands of the defendants. Voluminous matters are set forth in the bill, answers, exhibits and evidence, many of which, in the estimation of the court, have no material bearing upon the real controversy before it. I will not, therefore, state the allegations of the bill and answers in detail, but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Evertson v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- State ex rel. Rosenheim v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1867
- Levy v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Adkins v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by9 opinions
- Society for Visitation of Sick v. Commonwealth ex rel. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Commonwealth ex rel. Winpenny v. BunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Foster v. McGrawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Bartholomew's Administrator v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- McQuaide v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.