Legal Opinion

Nairn v. Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1941No. 3338Published

1Opinion

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.No 3338. Decided June 9, 1941

BY THE COURT:

On application for rehearing.

The appellant makes application for rehearing. The first portion of the motion is directed to a statement by the Court in its opinion, to the effect that the plaintiff gives a very concise and reasonable statement of why she did not discover the obstruction, stating that she had certain bundles in her hands and arms. Counsel sets out at considerable length the burdens then borne by plaintiff, among them, her purse, size unknown, a flower pot, pair of shoes, the pot and its enclosing paper making a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darst v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API