Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holland v. Fulbert, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 24, 1975Published

1Dissent

Larkin, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent.

The majority relies upon the statement by the Court of Appeals in Dorff v Bornstein (277 NY 236, 240-241) "a bona ñde purchaser (other than the owner) on an unconditional sale of real property pursuant to a regular foreclosure acquires a clear and absolute title as against all parties to the suit”. In Dorff (supra) the trial court found that the mortgagor, in collusion with his son and daughter, willfully defaulted in order to precipitate a foreclosure of the first mortgage and cut off the lien of the junior mortgage. A short time after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dorff v. BornsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Kossoff v. WaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API