Legal Opinion

Northrop v. Beale

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 14, 1936No. 546PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Petrie v. Nampa Irrigation District, 248 U. S. 154, 157; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207, 209-210. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Court of Appeals of Maryland upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox Film Corp. v. MullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. McCoy v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Petrie v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Legacy Funding LLC v. CohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Rothenberg v. Ralph D. Kaiser Co. (In Re Rothenberg)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  3. Quinn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Saunders v. StradleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API