Legal Opinion
Temple-Ashram v. Satyanandji
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 2016No. 2013-11102PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the legitimate board of trustees of the plaintiff Geeta Temple-Ashram is composed of the individual plaintiffs, Suresh Kapoor, Dilip Tolat, Vinod Goel, and Sharad Agarwal, and nonparty Vijay Gupta, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), entered October 7, 2013, which, after a nonjury trial on the issue of standing, and upon the granting of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint for lack of standing, made at the close of the plaintiffs’ case, dismissed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Velez v. GoldenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sung Kyu-To v. Triangle EquitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wehr v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Temple-Ashram v. SatyanandjiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Gen Yee Chu v. Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Verdi v. Jacoby & Meyers, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Zebzda v. Hudson Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018