Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Gosser
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided August 9, 1918PublishedCited by 23 opinions
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M.. Robles, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.
— Tiro suits of the same character between the same parties were, by order of the Chancellor, consolidated. The object of each of the suits is the specific performance of an alleged contract in writing, between the complainant and the defendant’s decedent, for the sale of certain real estate in the City of Tampa. The contracts are substantially the same in form and substance.
In the bill appearing first in the récord the contract is as follows:
“Tampa, Fla., Hillsborough Co., 2/25/1912.
“It is hereby agreed between Mrs. L. M. Gosser, party of the first part, and W. T. Boyd, party of the second…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simpson v. First National Bank of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Brickell v. Town of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Smith v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SandlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Schaefer v. VoyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Smith v. DowlingSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Polley v. Cline's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.