Legal Opinion

S. & W. Const. Co. v. Wood

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943No. 35357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is an attachment in chancery under Section 173, Code of 1930, which the Reporter will set out. The bill of complaint was filed by the appellee against E. E. Schmied, C. J. Wagner, Charles Weaver and the Bank of Sardis, and alleges in substance that he was employed by Schmied, Wagner and Weaver, and while engaged about their business was injured by their negligence in Panola County. Schmied and Wagner are nonresidents, but Weaver is a resident citizen, of Mississippi. The Bank of Sardis is indebted to them for money deposited by them with it. The prayer of the bill is for a judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fewell v. American Surety Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Williams v. GageMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Dinwiddie v. GlassMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ford v. Mut. L. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  5. National City Bank v. Stupp Bros. Bridge & Iron Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cupit v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API