Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Austin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Robert Austin (Austin) appeals his conviction by the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County of the summary offense of harboring a dangerous dog as set forth in Section 502-A of the Dog Law. 1 We affirm the trial court.

Austin kept a dog at his residence in the town of Ligonier in Westmoreland County; Valerie Tantlinger (Tantlinger) inns an excavating business from the adjoining property. On September 22, 2002, Tantlinger was walking on the rear section of her property when she heard a rustling sound behind her and turned to see Austin’s dog just as it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaldwinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. MorgeraCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SeylerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SmyersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Com. of PA v. A.M. GreenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Com. of PA v. G.L. CouteretCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Com. of PA v. J. BucherCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API