Barnett v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, J.'.Appellant, Elliott Barnett, appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and attempted armed robbery. Barnett argues that defense counsel’s failure to request an alibi instruction was ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on the face of the record, or, in the alternative, the failure to give the instruction resulted in fundamental error. Because Barnett failed to meet *536the heavy burden to prove either of these errors, we affirm.
Facts
The charges in this case arose from the shooting death ‘of William McFaline. The State presented the testimony of two co-defendants, Rasean Vann…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Garzon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Qavontae MacHell Lang v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Michael Jerome Lee v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Daniel Antoine Israel, Sr. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Pineda v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.