Legal Opinion

Strother v. Harjo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1925No. 13545PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Edmond Harjo, a minor, by his guardian, had judgment of the court without a jury against Strother and Gates for the recovery of one-fourth interest in certain real estate, rents, and profits, and for partition. Plaintiff claimed such interest as an heir at law of the original allottee, Oche Harjo, a Seminole Indian, intestate, leaving certain heirs, among whom was Jimmie Harjo, of whom and of one Eliza Harjo, plaintiff claimed to be son and heir. Defendants Strother and Gates had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. German State Bank of Elk City v. PtachekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. McAlpin v. HixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Grant v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Okmulgee County Business Men's Ass'n v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Bryan v. Okmulgee County Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Riddle's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Garner v. LammSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API