Legal Opinion
Linn v. Bryan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 7, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Cammack
Denying motion for writ.
*204This motion for “a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, a writ of prohibition” is an outgrowth of a, condemnation proceeding filed in the McCracken Circuit Court by the Kentucky Utilities Company against the petitioners in this proceeding. The Utilities Company instituted the condemnation proceeding under KRS 416.230. The landowners filed a general demurrer to the proceeding under KRS 416.260. The demurrer was overruled and the landowners then filed an additional pleading wherein the constitutionality of Chapter 186, Acts 1948, was attacked. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Madisonville H. & E. R. R. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Barker v. LannertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Jones v. TartarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Belcher v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Thompson v. Kentucky Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977