Oceantown Realty Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Long Beach City Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbraham Sohlissel, J.
Both parties hereto, agreeing that “ there are no triable issues of fact ”, move for summary judgment in this action to recover additional rent payable under a tax increase clause.
It is true that defendant has somewhat hedged this concession by a conditional reliance on the rule of ‘£ practical construction ’ ’. Since, however, defendant has agreed that this rule does not come into play unless the clause in question is first found to be *503ambiguous, which this court is convinced it is not, only a question of law is here required to be resolved.
On April 16, 1959 the parties hereto entered into a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- John J. Duane Realty Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Edra Associates v. Deer Park Beauty Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 1977
- Plaza v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Blount v. DenaultMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989