Legal Opinion

Seibert v. Mock

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1987No. 49A04-8610-CV-298PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-Appellants William L. Sei-bert and Marjorie L. Seibert (collectively the Seiberts) appeal a breach of contract damage award in favor of Plaintiff-Appel-lee James Mock.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The Seiberts present five issues for our review. We restate them as four: 1

1. whether the trial court erred by not applying the doctrine of Caveat Emptor;

2. whether the trial court erred by refusing to admit evidence of Mock's resale of the laundromat;

3. whether there was sufficient evidence to support the damage award; and

4. whether the trial court correctly awarded attorney…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. English Coal Co., Inc. v. DurcholzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. TrainaIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Indiana University v. Indiana Bonding & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nylen v. Park Doral ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Mid State Bank v. 84 Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Walton v. Claybridge Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Stepp v. DuffyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Posey v. Lafayette Bank and Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API