Legal Opinion

Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1985No. 82-7745PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We must decide whether a covered employee who quit his job is entitled to benefits under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978 (“Redwood Act”), Pub.L. No. 95-250, §§ 201-213, 92 Stat. 163, 172-82.1 Under the authority of Demarinis v. Donovan, 728 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir.1984), we must conclude that he is.

Holt was a foreman for Simpson Timber Company, an affected employer under the Redwood Act. See Redwood Act §§ 201(6)-(9). On January 16, 1979, Holt informed his supervisor that he was under “tremendous pressure” and wanted to quit. Told to reconsider, the next day Holt…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John E. Demarinis v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Rama D. Sanders v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Curtis W. Holt v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API