Hadfield v. Colter
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
Plaintiff sues for the contract price of goods sold and delivered by his assignor (Hadfield Hosiery Company, a Pennsylvania corporation),' which for the purpose of convenience I shall hereinafter designate as plaintiff.
Plaintiff, under a number of accepted orders received from defendants during the summer of. 1916, had agreed to deliver to defendants various quantities of stockings. The particular orders involved in the present controversy are known as Nos. 8 and 19. No. 8 called for the delivery of 4,000 dozen pairs of hose at a fixed price with certain discounts for payment in ten or thirty…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bernstein v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rubber Trading Co. v. Manhattan Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Canda v. . WickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Becker v. SeggieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hadfield v. ColterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- De Vivo v. GalleraniAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919