Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Clark v. Barlow

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was an action of co~oenant for non~payment of rent, and the only question submitted to the court was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover interest on a rent, being a specific sum, payable in money.

1Per curiam

We are of opinion, that in an action of covenant brought to recover a sum certain, due for rent, and payable in money, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the interest.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Obermyer v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
  2. Stewart v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. Van Rensselaer v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Van Rensselaer's Executors v. JewettNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Eaton v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API