Legal Opinion
Abbott Laboratories v. Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-0474-OGPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
Aggrieved by certain informal action taken by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or “Agency”), plaintiff Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) seeks de novo review of the Agency’s factual findings and declaratory and injunctive relief reversing the Agency’s resolution of pertinent legal issues. Abbott seeks this judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. The focus of the factual and legal disputes is the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., as amended by the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Frank D. Young, Dr., Commissioner, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Glaxo Operations UK Ltd. v. QuiggDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Abbott Laboratories v. Frank D. Young, Dr., Commissioner, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990