Legal Opinion
Lacorte v. Cytryn
New York Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 2013PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MATTER OF KRUEGER v. RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Maio v. McNamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Wagner v. ElasserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Sanon v. MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Hennessy v. Oneida County Bd. of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Kennedy v. Board of Elections in the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.