Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Lilly Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCANLESS, Justice.

Irene Gentry filed her bill against The Lilly Company, the employer of her husband, Ralph Gentry, and against its insur-*253anee carrier, to recover on behalf of her husband’s five dependent minor children and on her own behalf the death benefits provided by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The Chancellor decreed that when he was killed, Ralph Gentry had deviated from the scope of his employment and that his death was not compensable. He dismissed the complainant’s bill and she has appealed.

Ralph Gentry was a mechanic employed by The Lilly Company to service fork lifts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Frost v. Blue Ridge Timber Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Brewer v. Pocahontas Fuel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Haller Beverage Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prost v. City of Clarksville, Police Dept.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Overall v. Southern Subaru Star, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rainear v. C. J. Rainear Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Arden v. Hutch Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API