Legal Opinion

Brown v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1916No. Appeal, No. 375PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 375, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from final order of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 1100, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Mary A. Brown v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 375, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from final order of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 1100, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Mary A. Brown v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company. Trespass to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s husband. The facts appear in the following- opinion of Davis, J., sur plaintiff’s motion for a nonsuit: The deceased was riding a bicycle going west on North street, a street forty feet wide from house-line to house-line, the roadbed of North street being twenty feet in width. North street is situated between Fairmount…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

It was not possible for the learned court below to have avoided the conclusion that, under the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, the unfortunate death of her hus-' *478band was due to his failure to observe proper care in crossing Sixteenth street, and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the trial judge for entering the nonsuit.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geiger v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Scheffel v. Williamsport Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API