Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison v. U.S., Dept., Energy

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 5, 2000No. 99-1464Published

1Opinion of the Court

234 F.3d 642 (Fed. Cir. 2000)

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC., FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, GPU NUCLEAR, INC. (on behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, and Pennsylvania Electric Company), INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY, NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT, PECO ENERGY COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API