Lay v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.
Defendant-appellant (Lay) was charged by information with the offense of theft and was tried by jury and convicted. Lay was duly sentenced and now brings this appeal to us raising two issues, namely:(1) Is the evidence sufficient to support the conviction?(2) Did the trial court err in admitting certain evidence?
The evidence most favorable to the State reveals that on February 9, 1974, at about 12:30 o’clock P.M., three women, hereinafter referred to as A, B, and C, shipped four footlockers by bus from Evansville, Indiana, to Memphis, Tennessee. These footlockers were all mailed to the same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cotton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Grimes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- GAYNOR v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Lane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rhim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Fox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979