Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

American River Transportation v. United States, Corp of Eng

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2015No. 14-1867Published

1Concurring in the judgmentRiley, Chief Judge

Faced with “the unenviable task of deciding whether an impossibly obscure law (the [RHA]) prevails over a hopelessly anachronistic one (the Limitation Act),” we are — as the Fifth Circuit once described it — “adrift on muddied waters that lie at the convergence of two desultory streams of nineteenth century thought.” Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston v. United States, 557 F.2d 438, 441 (5th Cir.1977) (agreeing with commentary from 1957 that the Limitation Act “has been due for a general overhaul for the past seventy-five *441years; seventy-five years from now that statement will be still…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lake Tankers Corp. v. HennSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Complaint of the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. The Valley Line Company, Owner of the M/v A.D. Haynes v. Michael Ryan, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. American River Transportation v. United States, Corp of EngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API