Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Buchwalter
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO) appeals a ruling that an easement it acquired is void because the agreement failed to state the easement’s location “with reasonable particularity and definiteness” as prescribed by Code § 56-259. Appellees (collectively, Buchwalter) 2 assign cross-error to the trial court’s holdings that certain restrictive covenants running with their lots do not prohibit construction of an electric transmission line and that the structures VEPCO proposed to erect were included within the meaning of the term “pole” as it is used in the easement argreement.
In 1972,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richmond Cedar Works v. WestSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Burns v. Winchester Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- School Board of Sand Lick District v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- McCullough v. DashiellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- 1924 Leonard Road, L.L.C. v. Van RoekelSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Barris v. Keswick Homes, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Johnson v. CauleySupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Greenan v. SolomonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Schick v. Town of Colonial BeachWestmoreland County Circuit Court · 1993