Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 1972No. 72-131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A., we have dispensed with the necessity for oral argument and will consider the matter on the briefs submitted by the respective parties.

Appellee was charged with a violation of the narcotics law upon a seizure made under a search warrant issued by the Justice of the Peace. She filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized and the trial judge entered its order granting defendant’s motion to suppress. The State takes this appeal.

We have examined the affidavit for the search warrant together with the search…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Diggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. State v. SchwarzbauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. State v. LawCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API