State v. Mills
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LILES, Acting Chief Judge.
Pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A., we have dispensed with the necessity for oral argument and will consider the matter on the briefs submitted by the respective parties.
Appellee was charged with a violation of the narcotics law upon a seizure made under a search warrant issued by the Justice of the Peace. She filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized and the trial judge entered its order granting defendant’s motion to suppress. The State takes this appeal.
We have examined the affidavit for the search warrant together with the search…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Orr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Diggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- State v. SchwarzbauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- State v. LawCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1983