State v. West, 05 Je 57 (9-24-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant Timothy West appeals his conviction on six counts of rape of a child under thirteen years old. He argues that the prosecutor used improper evidence at trial, including a surprise witness, and that he was tried for uncharged crimes. He finds fault with his indictment because it encompasses a period of time beyond the victim's thirteenth birthday. He also raises an ineffective assistance of counsel argument, and challenges the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. Finally, Appellant challenges the constitutionality of his sentence pursuant toState v. Foster, 109 Ohio…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Pepin-McCaffreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Hill, 07-Je-52 (6-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008