Legal Opinion

John Phillip Winchester v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1968No. 22357_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant has appealed from a conviction of interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312.

An examination of the record reveals that the specifications of error have no merit.

The only question urged on appeal is whether the trial court erred in the giving of Instruction No. 12. 1 No objec tion was made to this instruction by appellant’s appointed trial counsel who is not the same counsel representing appellant on this appeal.

It is the contention here that trial counsel should have objected to this instruction on the theory that because of the wording of it the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Dwight Dewitt Robison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. J. Norman JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia CircuitCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Douglas Watson HeavlowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. John Glenn Dipple v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API