Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Schmitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

The motion of the defendant Schmitt to dismiss the complaint was predicated upon such pleading, the answer and *132admissions contained in plaintiff’s bill of particulars. It is well settled that admissions contained in a bill of particulars may be considered on a motion for judgment on the pleadings and that upon such a motion “ the court may consider whatever might properly be considered on a motion for judgment at the opening of the trial.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 476; Dineen v. May, 149 App. Div. 469.) It is also the rule that a bill of particulars may be considered as part of a pleading and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Dineen v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Maxherman Co. v. AlperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API