Rosenzweig v. Schmitt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The motion of the defendant Schmitt to dismiss the complaint was predicated upon such pleading, the answer and *132admissions contained in plaintiff’s bill of particulars. It is well settled that admissions contained in a bill of particulars may be considered on a motion for judgment on the pleadings and that upon such a motion “ the court may consider whatever might properly be considered on a motion for judgment at the opening of the trial.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 476; Dineen v. May, 149 App. Div. 469.) It is also the rule that a bill of particulars may be considered as part of a pleading and that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Dineen v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Maxherman Co. v. AlperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937