Legal Opinion

Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 6, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, Justice:

This appeal involves the validity, under the Delaware General Corporation Law, of objections to the merger of the Statler Hotels Delaware Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter “Statler”) with the defendant Hilton Hotels Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter “Hilton”).

As prerequisites to qualification for appraisal and payment for stock 8 Del.C. § 262(b) requires that a dissenting stockholder must (1) file with the corporation a written objection to the merger before the taking of the stockholder vote thereon; (2) refrain from voting his shares in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  3. Southern Production Co. v. SabathSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Zeeb v. Atlas Powder Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. CITIZENS'BANK & TRUST CO. OF MIDDLESBORO, KY. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Enstar Corp. v. SenoufSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Berger v. Pubco Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Raab v. Villager Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  5. In Re: Appraisal of Dell Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API