Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Jordan Valley Irrigation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1931Published

1Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing

(3 P. (2d) 534)

BEAN, C. J.

In a petition for rehearing attention is called to the matter of the duty of water pertaining to the right of plaintiff, William Skinner, which was fixed in our former memorandum opinion for 258.5 acres of land, as one-eightieth of a cubic foot of water per second of time, measured at the head of plaintiff’s service lateral or ditch for each acre of said land. The quantity of water was further Jimited by the length of the irrigation season.

As stated in onr former opinion, the duty of water, under the contract dated February, 1918, between…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skinner v. Jordan Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API