Legal Opinion

Ramsburg v. Sykes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 24, 1960No. [No. 128, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The question involved in this appeal is whether or not it was properly established in the trial below that the appellants (the Ramsburgs) are liable for the payment of certain surveying charges made by the appellee for surveying land belonging to the other appellee.

The case is unusual to the extent that, while not submitted upon an agreed statement of facts or stipulation, there does not seem to be a single dispute in the facts.

Jason A. Parker, one of the appellees, was the owner of some seven acres of unsubdivided land situate at the southwest corner of U. S. Route 40 at its intersection…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. v. RicasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Stem v. Nello L. Teer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  3. Reserve Insurance v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,878 Jane W. Hofherr and Robert A. Hofherr v. Dart Industries, Inc., and Eli Lilly & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. EhrhardtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API