Legal Opinion

Cozzone Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1954No. Appeal, No. 243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

Claimant, the present appellant, had been in the employ of Lukens Steel Company for two years. He was discharged on November 24, 1952 for violation of company rules. On his claim for unemployment compensation the Bureau ruled that he was ineligible for benefits under §402(e) of the Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 PS §802(e). In affirming the Bureau, the Referee after hearing found: “The claimant was in the habit of leaving his job before the regular quitting time, although he was paid for the full day. He had been warned numerous times that this conduct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Turner v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API